Recommended Weekend Reads

China’s New Latin American Playbook, Russia’s Increasingly Desperate Search for Soldiers, Who Will Succeed Xi as China’s Next President?,  and Geopolitical Implications of the Race for 6G

October 17 - 19, 2025

Below are a number of reports and articles we read this past week and found particularly interesting.  Hopefully,  you will find them of interest and useful as well.  Have a great weekend.

Latin America

• China’s New Playbook for Latin America         Americas Quarterly

  China has entered a new phase in its engagement with Latin America.  It is one still characterized by extensive resource-seeking and market-seeking activity, features of the relationship for more than three decades now. As China invests and trades in Latin American raw materials and builds markets across the region for everything from its toys and textiles to ultra-high-voltage transmission lines and cloud services, overall trade continues to rise.  At the same time, the relationship is rapidly evolving toward a more targeted, strategic approach. For all the recent attention given to China’s signature Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) infrastructure projects, Latin America’s relative share of investments under the plan is falling for the third consecutive year. The region received a little more than 1% of Beijing’s global BRI construction spending and 0.4% of outbound investment in the first half of 2025. Growth in Chinese foreign direct investment (FDI) in the region is also slowing. Whether those trends hold remains to be seen. But the days of Beijing showering the region with loans and large-scale infrastructure projects may be over, or at least diminished, replaced by more deliberate engagement and a focus on specific sectors of Chinese interest, especially at the higher end of the value chain.
  

• How China’s Energy Investments Provide Durable Influence in South America  Henry Zeimer/Center for Strategic and International Studies

  China’s growing presence in South American energy generation and distribution has largely gone underreported, even as it risks placing critical infrastructure under foreign influence. Properly grasping the nature of this influence is of particular importance as the United States finds itself in the midst of a shift to a more competitive stance in its foreign policy approach in the Western Hemisphere.

• What Is Mexico’s Amparo Reform? Everything You Need to Know    Moments in Mexico

  Mexico’s democracy is again on the precipice of a key inflection point. This time, it entails the Sheinbaum administration’s efforts to reform the amparo, a tool of the Mexican legal system that grants individuals the right of redress in the case of constitutional and/or human rights violations. There is no direct counterpart to the Mexican amparo in the United States; however, its functions are roughly carried out through a combination of civil rights litigation, judicial review, injunctions, and the writ of habeas corpus. The amparo and associated processes are complex. This piece is intended to provide a cursory overview and highlight the changes that the Sheinbaum administration seeks to impose.

Russia

• Putin Seeks More Foreign Fighters Amid Mounting Russian Losses in Ukraine   Atlantic Council

  As Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine approaches the four-year mark, Moscow is facing increasing difficulties replenishing the ranks of its invading army. With fewer Russians now prepared to volunteer, the Kremlin is seeking to recruit more foreign fighters to serve in Russian President Vladimir Putin’s colonial war. A number of recent media reports have highlighted the growing role of foreign nationals in the Russian military. In early October, an Indian citizen was captured by Ukrainian forces while fighting for Russia. The 22-year-old claimed to have been arrested in Russia while studying and pressured into signing a contract with the Russian army in order to secure his release from prison. After just two weeks of basic training, he was sent to the front lines of the war in Ukraine. Also in early October, the Los Angeles Times reported that Russia may have recruited tens of thousands of foreign fighters via social media, with many coming from disadvantaged countries across the Middle East, Africa, and East Asia. The article detailed how many of these recruits are allegedly enticed with offers of generous benefits including large salaries and Russian citizenship in exchange for military service in non-combat roles. In practice, however, most are soon sent straight into battle.

• The Shooting Party: Russia’s Evolving Threat Perceptions Since 2002    Center for Naval Analysis (CNA)

  In this paper, the authors examine how Russian military thinkers interpret and operationalize the threat perceptions defined by the country’s political leadership. Despite nearly four years of war in Ukraine, Russian security concerns regarding US military capabilities remain largely unchanged. Russian military thinkers continue to perceive US ballistic missile defense and Prompt Global Strike programs as the main threats to Russia’s security, believing these programs to be designed to degrade Russia’s retaliatory strike capabilities. The war in Ukraine has exposed gaps in Russia’s military capabilities, heightening Russian anxiety about the military contingents from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in the Baltic and Black Seas, particularly potential US deployments to Finland and Sweden. Viewing the substantial US and NATO military assistance to Ukraine as part of a broader strategy to weaken Russia, Russian military thinkers are particularly alarmed by Ukrainian offensive operations within Russian borders or those that target mainland Russia. Russian military thinkers believe that the United States and NATO are preparing for a long-term confrontation with Russia, which reinforces their views on the importance of maintaining and enhancing Russia’s strategic deterrence capabilities.

• ·Russia’s Crime-Terror Nexus: Criminality as a Tool of Hybrid Warfare in Europe    GLOBSEC/International Centre for Counter-Terrorism

  This report takes stock of Russian hybrid warfare in Europe in the context of its war of aggression against Ukraine. While doing so, it offers more than a catalogue of kinetic incidents attributed to Moscow. The report shows the extent to which criminality – whether through direct reliance on criminals to conduct attacks or through the “spook-gangster” nexus – constitutes a central pillar of Russia’s hybrid warfare. It opens with an overview of the phenomenon and traces Russia’s experience with hybrid tactics back to at least the 1920s. It then explores Moscow’s enduring use of criminality as a tool of domestic control and foreign policy, with particular emphasis on the post-2022 period.

China

• Xi Jinping's Successor and the Future of China    The Foreign Affairs  Interview Podcast

  When Xi Jinping took over the Chinese Communist Party in 2012, he began a new chapter in China’s history—one that would come to be defined above all by his grip on power. Xi overhauled not only the CCP but also China’s economy, military, and role in the world. Yet no matter how secure his power may be—and no matter his recent hot-mic musings about living to 150—what comes after Xi, and how it comes, is an increasingly central question in Chinese politics. As the political scientists Tyler Jost and Daniel Mattingly wrote recently in Foreign Affairs, “For any authoritarian regime, political succession is a moment of peril . . . and for all its strengths, the CCP is no exception.” And that’s not just a risk for the future. The uncertainty and the jockeying that the succession question spurs is already starting to shape China’s present. To Jost and Mattingly, there’s more at stake than just the matter of who will follow Xi. They note: “The drama created by a struggle over the succession . . . is unlikely to stay inside China’s borders.” They joined Deputy Editor Chloe Fox to discuss the nature of Xi’s rule, his attempt to define his legacy, and what that will mean for China in the coming months, years, and decades.
  

• Stabilizing the US–China Rivalry    Rand

  The geopolitical rivalry between the United States and China embodies risks of outright military conflict, economic warfare, and political subversion, as well as the danger that tensions between the world's two leading powers will destroy the potential for achieving a global consensus on such issues as climate and artificial intelligence. Moderating this rivalry, therefore, emerges as a critical goal, both for the United States and China and for the wider world. The authors of this report propose that, even in the context of intense competition, it might be possible to find limited mechanisms of stabilization across several specific issue areas. They offer specific recommendations both for general stabilization of the rivalry and for three issue areas: Taiwan, the South China Sea, and competition in science and technology.

Geoeconomics, Technology, Global Food Policy, and Dealing with Student Absenteeism

• 6G isn’t about speed. It’s about sovereignty    The Strategist

  The race to 6G isn’t just about bandwidth. It’s about control over spectrum, standards, supply chains, and the values underpinning tomorrow’s infrastructure. If 5G taught us anything, trust and interoperability need to be built in from the start.  The Indo-Pacific is already the world’s most contested connectivity environment. Through submarine cables, cloud platforms, and national 5G rollouts, governments are already making decisions that will shape how their citizens communicate, how their economies function, and who sets the rules. The shift to 6G only sharpens that contest.  Reporting from the Financial Times makes clear that China is moving fast. Beijing is systematically excluding European vendors from its domestic telecommunications networks. Ericsson and Nokia, already reduced to a 4 percent market share, now face opaque security reviews that stretch for months. The message is that foreign firms aren’t welcome, while domestic vendors are being positioned as the only trusted suppliers for national infrastructure. They are backed by policy, shielded from competition, and expected to dominate the market at home and abroad.
  

• Why Have Inflation Expectations Surged Recently? A Historical Perspective  Federal Reserve Bank of Boston

  Average near-term household inflation expectations in the Michigan Survey of Consumers have peaked higher than 8% four times in the past 60 years: twice in the 1970s, during the 2021-2022 post-pandemic inflation surge, and since spring 2025. Coincident sharp increases in gas and food prices, along with underlying broad-based inflation, explain a large share of the 2021-2022 spike in inflation expectations; those factors also accounted for about two-thirds of the 1973-1975 surge. The 1978-1980 increase in inflation expectations was much larger than the increase that rising prices usually would imply, consistent with the de-anchoring of inflation expectations at that time. Rising prices can barely explain the 2025 surge observed in the Michigan Survey of Consumers, which may signal that the risk of de-anchoring is larger than it was in the pre-pandemic period.
  

• Is the U.S. in an Above-Target Inflation Regime?    Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

  Since January 2012, the Federal Reserve has adopted an explicit target of 2% inflation, measured as the 12-month change in the personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index.1 And yet, after several years of below-target inflation prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, inflation rose above 2% annually in March 2021 and has persisted above 2% ever since. According to the latest data available (August 2025), inflation remains significantly above target, at 2.7%. In previous blog posts, I have analyzed these dynamics and their likely origin. In this blog post, my analysis suggests that we may be in a persistent above-target inflation regime.
  

• The Challenge to Feed the World in the 21st Century: Useless, Harmful, and Helpful Policies  American Enterprise Institute

  Hunger, malnutrition, and food insecurity remain significant global problems, but instead of working toward solutions, Western governments are implementing policies guaranteed to reduce food production. Environmental benefits often attributed to policies that support biofuels, organic agriculture, land conservation programs, and similar strategies appear to be moderate or disappear once their impacts on the conversion of forested lands to agriculture are considered. The United Nations and the European Commission propose reducing food loss and waste and eating fewer animal products as strategies to combat food scarcity, but neither approach would likely be effective. To address world hunger, malnutrition, and food insecurity, the United States and other rich countries must stop enacting policies and supporting production practices that reduce agricultural yields, divert production from food to fuel, and encourage the conversion of forested lands to agricultural production across the world.

• Need Not Be a Surprise: Early-Warning Systems for Chronic Absenteeism     Nat Malkus/Sam Hollen – American Enterprise Institute

  The COVID-19 pandemic drove up chronic absenteeism in nearly every school and student demographic, making district leaders’ task of targeting resources difficult. Whom do you help when every student is a candidate? Existing work shows that it is possible to predict absenteeism in advance, but past approaches are largely proprietary or hard for district leaders to use. We present a series of early-warning systems, starting very simple and adding complexity, with district leaders’ needs and constraints in mind.

Recommended Weekend Reads

America’s Secret Weapon for its Critical Weapons Strategy, How China’s Economy is Weathering the Economic Storm, AI’s Exponential Growth is Not Impacting the Labor Market, and What Impact Pharma Tariffs Will Have on Healthcare Costs

October 3 - 5, 2025

Each week, we gather up the best research and reports we have read in the past week and pass them on to you.  Below is this week’s curated collection.  We hope you find them interesting and informative, and that you have a great weekend.

Updates on the Global Race for Critical Minerals

• The Secret Weapon in America’s Critical Minerals Strategy    Hudson Institute’s “First Breakfast”

  Since 1980, leaders in Washington have stressed the need to secure rare earth supply chains to achieve strategic independence from America’s adversaries.  In the coming weeks, Congress will decide on legislation reauthorizing the International Development Finance Corporation (DFC), the little-known agency established during the first Trump administration as a counterweight to China’s predatory investment practices under its Belt & Road Initiative. The DFC maintains a dual mandate to advance U.S. foreign policy and economic development by mobilizing the private sector abroad, injecting capital, and offering insurance to support projects that further U.S. strategic goals. Given the great demand for rare earths and their refined products here at home, the DFC presents an opportunity to work with our foreign partners and American businesses to bolster our supply chains abroad. This is not a new idea; the creators of the BUILD Act, which authorized the DFC, envisioned the agency investing in key industries like mining, energy, and logistics. Unfortunately, results in the mineral sector have fallen short of these aspirations. Since operations began in December 2019, the DFC has made nearly 650 investments, fewer than a dozen of which are in mining-related projects.

• Leveraging US-Africa critical mineral opportunities: Strategies for success   Brookings Institution

  The U.S. is highly dependent on imports of critical minerals, but existing supply chains are vulnerable, plagued with high geographic concentration, slow mine development, and under-researched reserves. The authors argue for why Africa is uniquely positioned to partner with the U.S. in a supply chain realignment, given the former’s significant reserves, existing mining and refining infrastructure, and business opportunities along development corridors. With other countries such as China, India, Saudi Arabia, and the European Union entering into the African critical minerals sector, the U.S. should not be left behind.  The authors provide actionable recommendations to both the U.S. and African countries for creating and growing a mutually beneficial critical minerals partnership.

Russia & China 

• Changing Course in a Storm: China’s Economy in the Trade War     China Leadership Monitor

  China is weathering deflation, a property-sector collapse, and renewed trade tensions with the United States through calculated restraint rather than panic. Exports remain resilient via market diversification and price cuts. Chinese leaders are deploying targeted fiscal interventions, pursuing supply-side reforms, and combating “involution”–destructive race-to-the-bottom competition eroding profits across industries. This strategic patience reveals Beijing’s fundamental gamble: accept short-term economic pain to build long-term technological dominance and self-sufficiency. The leadership believes that the emerging high-tech sectors will ultimately replace both lost export markets and the crumbling property engine. This is a high-stakes bet on China’s ability to transform its economic model under pressure.

• With Putin in Charge, Russia’s Vassalage to China Will Only Deepen     Carnegie Politika

  Moscow should be looking for ways to correct its course and restore balance in its foreign policy, instead of putting all its eggs in the China basket. But Putin is no pragmatic decision-maker, and the deepening vassalage to China is his own choice.

• Global FDI is uncoupling from China   Robin Brook’s Substack

  Brooks writes: “A few weeks ago, I wrote a post about how foreign investors have been putting less money to work in China, with non-resident flows into China a lot weaker since the invasion of Ukraine. Weaker foreign flows into China stand in contrast to flows to the rest of EM, where inflows have rebounded to very robust levels. This suggests that global markets - in the wake of the Ukraine invasion - are paying closer attention to geopolitical risks and are taking a more cautious approach to China.”

•  Don’t Overestimate the Autocratic Alliance     Foreign Affairs

  No moment captured the shifting global balance of power more vividly than when Chinese leader Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un walked in lockstep on the red carpet at China’s military parade in early September. The three autocrats, despite a long history of mutual suspicion, projected a show of unity against Washington. The message behind the carefully managed scene was unmistakable: China is at the center of a rising anti-Western bloc, while the United States is adrift—divided at home, faltering abroad, and rebuffed by its rivals.   But beneath this show of solidarity, China, North Korea, and Russia remain uneasy partners. What the three countries have is a tactical alignment rooted not in trust or shared values but in overlapping grievances and necessity. History demonstrates that they are not natural allies. Each state remains wary of entrapment and is unwilling to subordinate its national interests to those of the others. And crucially, each still seeks something from the United States—leverage that Washington must wield wisely.

Geoeconomics

• Evaluating the Impact of AI on the Labor Market: Current State of Affairs    The Yale Budget Lab

  The Yale Budget Lab looks at how AI is impacting employment – specifically, whether it is causing an increase in unemployment.  Their report shows that overall, their metrics indicate that the broader labor market has not experienced a discernible disruption since ChatGPT’s release 33 months ago, undercutting fears that AI automation is currently eroding the demand for cognitive labor across the economy.
  

• The Geoeconomic Interconnectivity Index        Bertelsmann Stiftung/ECIPE

  In today’s European neighborhood, trade, investment, and economic policy have become deeply entangled with geopolitical competition — involving the EU, the United States, China, and Russia as leading geoeconomic actors. The Geoeconomic Interconnectivity Index brings together a wide range of indicators across trade, investment, and economic policy in an accessible, comparable format. Covering the years 2010 to 2023, it provides a clear picture of evolving patterns of economic engagement.  The Index is designed to support timely and informed debate on the EU’s external policies — offering insights that matter in a geoeconomic age.

• How Pharmaceutical Tariffs Will Affect US Health Care Costs       Alex Brill/AEI Economic Perspectives

  Tariffs on pharmaceuticals are under consideration following a Section 232 investigation into imports of medicines and active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). With US imports in 2024 totaling $210.8 billion in finished medicines and $36.2 billion in APIs, the threat of tariffs puts nearly $250 billion in trade at risk. Tariffs could raise list or net prices for pharmaceuticals, drive up insurance premiums, increase the risk of drug shortages, elevate costs for US producers using imported APIs, and reduce the competitiveness of US exports of finished drugs.

•  War, Geopolitics, Energy Crisis: How the Economy Evades Every Disaster   The Economist

  The world economy appears impressively and increasingly shock-absorbent. Supply chains in goods—widely believed to be a source of fragility—have shown themselves to be resilient. A more diverse supply of energy and a less fossil-fuel-intensive economy have reduced the impact of changes in the oil price. And across the world, economic policymaking has improved. According to the conventional narrative, the “great moderation”, a period of steady growth and predictable policymaking, ran from the late 1980s to the global financial crisis of 2007-09. But perhaps it did not die alongside Lehman Brothers.  This year, just 5% of countries are on track for a recession, according to IMF data—the least since 2007. Unemployment in the OECD club of rich countries is below 5% and close to a record low. In the first quarter of 2025, global corporate earnings rose by 7% year on year. Emerging markets, long prone to capital flight in times of trouble, now tend to avoid currency or debt crises (see chart 3). Consumers across the world, despite claiming to be down in the dumps, spend freely. On almost any measure, the economy is basically fine. 

Recommended Weekend Reads

Assessing the EU’s Defense Sector Build-Up, New Studies on the Economic Impact of Trump’s Tariffs, China’s “Anti-Involution” Campaign, and Russia’s Shrewd Focus on Africa 

September 19 - 21, 2025

Each week, we gather up the best research and reports we have read in the past week and pass them on to you.  Below is this week’s curated collection.  We hope you find them interesting and informative, and that you have a great weekend.

The Growth of the EU’s Defense Sector

• Progress and Shortfalls in Europe’s Defense: An Assessment    International Institute for Strategic Studies

  This IISS Strategic Dossier examines important capability areas that European allies need to address in order to reduce their vulnerabilities and overdependence on the US. The aim is to identify existing gaps and challenges but also note where progress has already been made towards a situation where adequate capabilities for the defense of Europe are provided by Europeans in a more autonomous way, while still working with partners and allies.

• Defense Expenditures of NATO Countries (2014 – 2025)        NATO

  NATO collects defense expenditure data from Allies and publishes it on a regular basis. Each Ally’s Ministry of Defence reports current and estimated future defense expenditure according to an agreed definition. The amounts represent payments by a national government that have been or will be made during the course of the fiscal year to meet the needs of its armed forces, those of Allies or of the Alliance. In the figures and tables that follow, NATO also uses economic and demographic information available from the Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs of the European Commission (DG ECFIN), the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). In view of differences between these sources and national GDP forecasts, and also the definition of NATO defense expenditure and national definitions, the figures shown in this report may considerably diverge from those that are referenced by media, published by national authorities or given in national budgets. Equipment expenditure includes expenditure on major equipment as well as on research and development devoted to major equipment. Personnel expenditure includes pensions paid to retirees. The cut-off date for information used in this report was 3 June 2025. Figures for 2024 and 2025 are estimates.

• The EU’s Road to Economic Security De-Risking, Strategic Investments and Critical Partnerships   Italian Institute for International Political Studies

  The European Union has redefined its strategic priorities through three phases: the rise of geoeconomics, the structuring of de-risking, and its current testing in a shifting global context. Geoeconomics exposed the link between economy, security, and power, driven by US and Chinese strategies to weaponize industrial assets and by renewed geopolitical rivalry. Europe’s dependence on critical raw materials, especially Chinese rare earths, accelerated the push for strategic autonomy. Since 2021, with the European Economic Security Strategy, the Chips Act, and the Critical Raw Materials Act, Brussels has pursued de-risking as diversification rather than decoupling, focusing on semiconductors, green technologies, and critical minerals. Yet US, Japanese, and South Korean industrial policies show de-risking is a broader challenge. The EU must now deliver concrete results, combining competitiveness and resilience with multilateral cooperation. How can Europe secure adequate resources to meet these goals? And how can it balance industrial autonomy with global partnerships?

China’s Competitiveness Challenge

• China Wants to Integrate AI Into 90 Percent of Its Economy by 2030. It Won’t Work.   Carnegie Emissary

  Recently, Beijing debuted its latest strategy for winning the AI race. China’s powerful State Council laid out an ambitious vision to rapidly diffuse AI into six key areas, ranging from accelerating scientific research and development to improving governance capacity. The plan sets striking, concrete targets that include deploying a range of applications across 90 percent of wide swaths of its economy in just five years. China’s latest plan is part of a broader strategic bet. The PRC thinks it can integrate AI throughout its society to turbocharge its economy and secure AI leadership. It’s a playbook the country has used before. During the mid-2010s, China transformed its digital economy by diffusing internet applications throughout what Beijing calls the “real economy.”  But this time could be very different. Chinese leadership is confident in its AI development, but—perhaps counterintuitively—investors are not. China’s venture capital ecosystem is dry at this critical moment for AI, and as a result, Beijing’s aspirations are likely to fall short of the whole-of-society economic transformation the party wants. U.S. policymakers should mostly ignore China’s aspirational rhetoric and focus on what it can achieve in practice.  

• Involution and Industry Self-Discipline: Echoes from the Past    Center for Strategic and International Studies

  No doubt the word of the year in China is “involution.” The term in Chinese really did not exist prior to 2020, but its use has exploded since, particularly in 2025. When the Chinese term first emerged in popular culture in China a few years ago, the initial application was to Chinese students and young people trapped in highly competitive schools and jobs that brought little personal fulfillment, with immense efforts and sacrifices that to many seemed ultimately meaningless, a feeling made more acute by the arrival of the pandemic. This led many to respond by giving up on their ambitions and “lying flat”, which has also been a source of much social debate.   

  In 2025, involution now refers specifically to the widespread phenomenon of continued massive expansion of production in sector after sector, despite any semblance of sufficient domestic demand to absorb these goods. Chinese officialdom has vociferously rebutted charges by foreign governments that China has been suffering from “overcapacity.  As part of this retort, it has been argued that industrial policy and subsidies are not the source of China’s industrial strength, but rather high quality and competitiveness. As a result, governments around the world are wrong to impose any restrictions on Chinese exports.  But while China is rebuffing international charges of overcapacity, it has opened the doors to a domestic debate about involution and how to tackle it. Hence, the emergence of a highly public conversation about “anti-involution policy, a catch-phrase which has also spread like wildfire.

 Updates on Global Trade Wars

• Markets shrug off trade conflicts    Bank for International Settlements

  In a new study, BIS found that global financial markets maintained a risk-on tone during the review period, shrugging off concerns over mounting tariff and policy uncertainty. Despite short-lived bouts of volatility triggered by incoming data and political developments, market sentiment remained upbeat, defying mounting challenges, including unease over the longer-run fiscal outlook in several key jurisdictions. Short-term bonds priced in greater policy easing, but long-term yields stayed high and yield curves steepened at the very long end on fiscal and inflation concerns.  Emerging market assets saw gains, benefiting from the risk-on environment and the weakening of the US dollar.

• The Trump Shock That Wasn’t (At Least Not Yet)   Brad Setser/Council on Foreign Relations

  President Trump’s tariffs have been a profound shock to the global trade rules.  They have generated enormous volatility in measured trade flows. But so far the volatility has essentially come from pharmaceuticals and gold (including gold bars, or imports of “metal forms”). The impact of the tariffs core trade flows—and hence the global economy—has been modest, at least so far. 

• Tariffs, Manufacturing Employment, and Supply Chains    Joseph Steinberg/NBER

  Abstract: I use a dynamic general-equilibrium model with supply-chain adjustment frictions to study the effects of tariffs on manufacturing employment. The model has four distinct manufacturing sectors: upstream goods with high trade elasticities (“oil”); upstream goods with low trade elasticities (“steel”); downstream goods with high trade elasticities (“toys”); and downstream goods with low trade elasticities (“cars”). I find that tariffs can increase overall manufacturing employment in the long run, but are likely to reduce it in the short run, and cause more reallocation of workers across these individual sectors than overall employment growth.

Russian Foreign Policy 

• Russia is Shrewdly Playing the Long Game in Africa    War on the Rocks

  What if Moscow’s most dangerous moves right now aren’t in Europe, but along the Gulf of Guinea? With its resources sunk deep into Ukraine, the Russian military has weighed carefully whether and when to engage elsewhere, standing aside amid recent conflicts in the South Caucasus and Middle East. An exception to this pattern of inaction is in West Africa. After the failed mutiny of Wagner Group chief Yevgeny Prigozhin in June 2023, the Russian government established a new paramilitary group called Africa Corps, tethered closely to the military chain of command. The unit then progressively took over most of Wagner’s operations in Africa and expanded into Burkina Faso and Niger. It now seems to be eyeing a presence in Benin and Togo next. These activities suggest that Russia is seeking a West African foothold on which to build once an end to the war on Ukraine frees up additional conventional military forces. Russia may then try to further extend Africa Corps’ presence.

• The Scale of Russian Sabotage Operations Against Europe’s Critical Infrastructure    IISS

  Russia is waging an unconventional war on Europe. Through its campaign of sabotage, vandalism, espionage and covert action, Russia’s aim has been to destabilize European governments, undermine public support for Ukraine by imposing social and economic costs on Europe, and weaken the collective ability of NATO and the European Union to respond to Russian aggression. This unconventional war began to escalate in 2022 in parallel to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. While Russia has so far failed to achieve its primary aim, European capitals have struggled to respond to Russian sabotage operations and have found it challenging to agree a unified response, coordinate action, develop effective deterrence measures and impose sufficient costs on the Kremlin. IISS has created the most comprehensive open-source database of suspected and confirmed Russian sabotage operations targeting Europe. The data reveals Russian sabotage has been aimed at Europe’s critical infrastructure, is decentralized and, despite European security and intelligence officials raising the alarm, is largely unaffected by NATO, EU and member state responses to date.

Recommended Weekend Reads

Are the CRINKs a Real Global Power Bloc Or Not? Taking a Deep Dive into the US-Japan Trade Deal, and the Projected Impact of Generative AI on Productivity Growth

September 12 - 14, 2025

Each week, we gather up the best research and reports we have read in the past week and pass them on to you.  Below is this week’s curated collection.  We hope you find them interesting and informative, and that you have a great weekend.

What’s Up with The CRINK’s?

• CRINK Economic Ties: Uneven Patterns of Collaboration   Center for Strategic and International Studies

  This brief explores the post-2022 economic ties among China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea—the so-called CRINK states. Historically, economic alignment among military allies has been uneven and has not necessarily indicated the formation of a cohesive bloc. The World War II–era Axis powers, for instance, had fragmented economic cooperation due to geographic distance, wartime needs, sanctions, mistrust, and a focus on self-sufficiency—factors that also constrain CRINK today. Still, signs, including rising trade in energy and dual-use technologies, point to growing economic coordination. Assessing these ties is difficult, however, due to limited or opaque data (especially from Iran and North Korea) and increased informal trade since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. This brief draws from diverse international and industry-specific sources to fill data gaps. Findings show uneven patterns: China-Russia economic ties have grown, especially in energy and dual-use goods, but Chinese investment in Russia remains modest amid concerns over sanctions-related investment risks. Other CRINK members show far weaker economic coordination.
  

• Russia’s New Fear Factor   Foreign Affairs

  Among elites in Russia today, something dark is happening.  According to Novaya Gazeta, the independent Russian newspaper, there have been 56 deaths of successful businesspeople and officials under strange circumstances since February 2022. Many of them have fallen out of windows.  More and more, people who have loyally served Putin’s system are being persecuted, mainly on the grounds of corruption.  As the Putin regime turns on its own people, it, too, has begun to replace them with a new breed of loyalists, people whose primary qualifications are their apparent fealty to the leader, and sometimes their participation in the war. Still, Putin prefers experienced and talented technocrats for the most responsible positions, such as governors and ministers. After more than three and a half years of war and mounting economic challenges, Putin’s aim is not to fight corruption. His goal is to avoid internal threats. And to do that, he needs to turn the elites into a frightened and therefore controllable class.
  

• China’s Anti-Western Bloc? Not So Fast   Center For European Analysis

  The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit in Tianjin from August 31-September 1 was filled with carefully curated images of the post-Western world that China is working to construct.  For the men complaining that they, and their peoples, have been poorly rewarded by the global system, this was a big moment. Photographs captured China’s Xi Jinping, Russia’s Vladimir Putin, and India’s Narendra Modi in a huddle and holding hands. That in itself was enough to send a not-very-friendly message to the United States and its European and Asian allies.  But that snapshot failed to show intense competing agendas among these countries. For now, at least, it is premature to interpret it as either a significant challenge to the Western order or an alliance of authoritarian states. 

• Why India and China Remain Bitter Rivals    Shyam Saran/Time

  Shyam Saran is a former Foreign Secretary of India and the author of “How China Sees India and the World.”  In this essay, he argues that the visuals of exaggerated cordiality between Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India, President Vladimir Putin of Russia, and President Xi Jinping of China at the recently held Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit on September 1 displayed China’s convening power. But the gathering of major non-Western leaders in Tianjin, a city in eastern China, didn’t do much to resolve the long-standing border dispute and ever-growing competition between India and China. 

Update on the Trade Wars

• Investing in Security and Success: Analysis of the US-Japan $550 Billion Strategic Investment Fund    The Hudson Institute

  The centerpiece of the recent trade agreement between the United States and Japan was Japan’s promise to invest $550 billion in a new fund that would help “rebuild and expand core American industries.” On September 4, the US and Japan signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) that details the full scope of the investment framework, including:

  • Japan should allocate the $550 billion before President Donald Trump’s term ends on January 19, 2029.

  • Investments should go to key strategic sectors—semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, critical minerals, metals, shipbuilding, energy (including pipelines), artificial intelligence (AI), and quantum computing.

  • The president will create an investment committee to recommend and oversee investments. The US Secretary of Commerce will chair the investment committee and select its other members.

  • A consultation committee, with designees from both the United States and Japan, will advise an investment committee, which will then recommend projects. The consultation committee will also provide legal and strategic input to the investment committee.

  • The United States Investment Accelerator will execute, manage, and administer the investments. This office is based within the Department of Commerce, and the Secretary of Commerce has the power to appoint its executive director.

  • The US will create a special purpose vehicle (SPV) for each investment. The US or its designees will govern these investment SPVs.

  • With the president’s approval, the US will propose projects and their investment amounts for Japan to review. Japan will have about two months to respond and transfer the necessary funds—in US dollars—to the investment accelerator.

  • Japan has the right to decline to fund all or part of a project. But the US can then impose tariffs on Japanese imports in response.

  • Japan and the US will evenly split profits from the project until Japan recoups its investment. Afterward, profits will be disbursed at a ratio of 90 percent to the US and 10 percent to Japan.

  • The US government will try to arrange leases to federal land, access, water, power, and energy to investment projects, as well as organize offtake arrangements. The federal government will also expedite relevant regulatory processes.

  • When possible, Japanese firms will receive priority over comparable foreign firms to serve as vendors and suppliers for projects.

• A Guide to Trump’s Section 232 Tariffs, in Maps   Council on Foreign Relations

  Section 232 tariffs aim to protect U.S. national security. Created by the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, Section 232 empowers the president to charge duties pending the results of a Department of Commerce investigation into the imports’ effects on national security. The Donald Trump administration has already used this tool to raise levies on aluminum, cars and car parts, copper, and steel—and has launched Section 232 investigations into nine other types of products. These twelve graphics dive into each sector, laying out the scale of imports, their concentration by country, and the geopolitics of exporting nations, separating friends—NATO members, major non-NATO allies, and free trade agreement (FTA) partners—from potential foes.

Geoeconomics, Data Centers, and Power Generation

• Financial Bubbles Happen Less Often Than You Think   William Goetzman/Wall Street Journal

  Bubbles loom large in our historical understanding of the financial markets. They are memorable. They are colorful. They are scary. They raise questions about investor psychology and the madness of crowds. In good times, we worry if we’re going to be caught in the next big bubble. Looking at financial bubbles since 1790, however, we find that they are much rarer than their presence in the public imagination—and not necessarily purely negative. They sometimes set the stage for major changes in people’s worldviews, upending old ideas about the possibilities and limitations of business. Sometimes bubbles remake society itself, as all that investor money funds technological advances that change the world.

• The New Economic Nationalism: Industrial Policy and National Security in the United States, China, and the European Union    Geoforum

  Abstract: This paper examines the resurgence of industrial policy and national security strategy across the United States, China, and the European Union. We analyze how these major economic powers are implementing distinct approaches to industrial policy while pursuing similar objectives of technological leadership and national economic prosperity. The United States has adopted a hawkish stance with extensive trade policies and subsidies. China has pursued ambitious growth in a range of sectors through long-term planning and strong government control. The European Union has balanced autonomy with trade openness and somewhat less state intervention. Our comparative analysis reveals that while these policies may be successful in strengthening domestic economies, they collectively reshape the world economy in ways that may disadvantage other nations, especially in the global South. However, ‘connector’ countries in the global South are benefiting by forging strategic ties with several superpowers. Additionally, the rise of China gives hope for South-South development cooperation that upend existing imperial arrangements often characterized by North-South relations. We argue that the convergence of industrial policy and national security represents more than a temporary response to recent disruptions; it signals a fundamental shift in the world economy towards more economic nationalism.

• The Projected Impact of Generative AI on Future Productivity Growth   Penn Wharton Budget Model

  The Penn Wharton Budget Model (PWBM) team estimates that 40 percent of current GDP could be substantially affected by generative AI. Occupations around the 80th percentile of earnings are the most exposed, with around half of their work susceptible to automation by AI, on average. The highest-earning occupations are less exposed, and the lowest-earning occupations are the least exposed. 

  • AI’s boost to productivity growth is strongest in the early 2030s, with a peak annual contribution of 0.2 percentage points in 2032. After adoption saturates, growth reverts to trend. Because sectors that are more exposed to AI have faster trend TFP growth, sectoral shifts during the AI transition add a lasting 0.04 percentage point boost to aggregate growth. 

  • Compounded, TFP and GDP levels are 1.5% higher by 2035, nearly 3% by 2055, and 3.7% by 2075, meaning that AI leads to a permanent increase in the level of economic activity. 

  • Caution is required in interpreting these projections of AI’s impact, which are based on limited data on AI’s initial effects. Future data and developments in AI technology could lead to a significant change in these estimates.

  • In ongoing work, PWBM is estimating the impact of AI on the federal budget. In very preliminary analysis, we estimate that AI could reduce deficits by $400 billion over the ten-year budget window between 2026 and 2035.

• How Retainable are AI-Exposed Workers?     Federal Reserve Bank of New York

  Abstract:  We document the extent to which workers in AI-exposed occupations can successfully retrain for AI- intensive work. We assemble a new workforce development dataset spanning over 1.6 million job training participation spells from all U.S. Workforce Investment and Opportunity Act programs from 2012 to 2023, linked with occupational measures of AI exposure. Using earnings records observed before and after training, we compare high AI exposure trainees to a matched sample of similar workers who only received job search assistance. We find that the average earnings return to training among AI-exposed workers is high, around $1,470 per quarter. Low-exposure trainees capture higher returns, and trainees who target AI-intensive work face a 29 percent earnings return penalty relative to their high-exposure peers who pursue more general training. We estimate that between 25 and 40 percent of occupations are “AI retrainable” as measured by their workers receiving higher pay for moving to more AI-intensive occupations—a large magnitude given the relatively low-income sample of displaced workers. Positive earnings returns in all groups are driven by the most recent years when labor markets were tightest, suggesting training programs may have stronger signal value when firms reach deeper into the skill market.  

• Data Centers Make the Beige Book, Plus Power Problems    Paul Kedrosky Blog

  Recent reports from the Federal Reserve’s Beige Book and five regional Federal Reserve Banks point out that the explosion of data center construction is “causing a step increase in regional electricity loads” – meaning, power generation is the biggest constraint on continued data center capex at the current rate.

Recommended Weekend Reads

Is Trade Uncertainty Boosting Automation? Putin’s Fear of Economic Humiliation, American Soybean Farmers Feeling the Pain of China’s Boycott,  And How Geopolitical Risk Impacts Consumer Spending

September 5 - 7, 2025

Each week, we gather up the best research and reports we have read in the past week and pass them on to you.  Below is this week’s curated collection.  We hope you find them interesting and informative, and that you have a great weekend.

Geoeconomics & Trade

• Will Trade Uncertainty Boost Automation?    Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

  Recent surges in trade policy uncertainty highlight the fragility of global supply chains, prompting businesses to consider reshoring—moving production from abroad to domestic locations. Reshoring can be costly, creating incentives for businesses to automate. Evidence suggests that businesses facing heightened trade policy uncertainty in industries more exposed to international trade reshore more and automate more than those that are less exposed to trade. Automation appears to help mitigate the otherwise negative effects of trade policy uncertainty on production and labor productivity.

• In Tariff Standoff with Trump, China Boycotts American Soybeans    New York Times

  China has rare earth metals. The United States and Brazil have soybeans. For all the chokeholds China maintains on global supply chains, it is overwhelmingly dependent on soybeans from other parts of the world. China imports three-fifths of all the soybeans traded on international markets. Now with China and the United States locked in a tense standoff over tariffs, soybeans have emerged as a central dispute between the trading partners.  China has been boycotting purchases of U.S. soybeans since late May to show displeasure with President Trump’s imposition of tariffs on imports from China. The pain is being felt in Midwest states, especially Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota and Indiana. For the first time in many years, American farmers are preparing to harvest their crop this fall with no purchase orders from China.
  

• Effects of Tariff Uncertainty on the Outlook of Small and Medium-sized Businesses   Federal Reserve Bank of Boston

  A large body of research demonstrates that uncertainty affects many dimensions of firms’ decisions, from investment and hiring to pricing and profitability. To gain a better understanding of how uncertainty induced by shifting trade policy shapes the behavior of small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) the authors surveyed decision-makers at SMBs. Key Takeaways include:

  • Results from the survey indicate that uncertainty about tariffs rose markedly from the first wave to the third for all SMBs, and especially for importers.

  • Survey respondents with greater uncertainty about tariffs in April 2025 – and especially those that import – tended to report greater uncertainty about business operations, particularly about investment and worker head count.

  • The respondents indicated that a hypothetical reduction in business uncertainty would improve their expectations, but another increase in business uncertainty would not lead to further deterioration in their outlook.

  • The muted reaction to a hypothetical increase in business uncertainty suggests that by April 2025, the effect of increased uncertainty on SMBs’ expectations may have already peaked and/or that financial conditions had not tightened enough to notably amplify any negative real effects of further increases in uncertainty.

• The Fiscal Impact of Immigration: An Update    AEI Economic Perspectives

  Immigrants have an overall positive fiscal impact on the US—an effect driven by high-skilled
  immigrants. Low-skilled immigrants, like their US-born counterparts, impose a net fiscal cost.
  However, recent studies show that the indirect fiscal effects of low-skilled immigration are positive,
  partly offsetting the negative direct fiscal impact. Moreover, immigrants will help bear the cost
  of future policy changes required to address the growing national debt. Smaller immigration
  inflows might reduce fiscal pressure on state and local governments, but would increase fiscal
  pressure on the federal government and slow economic growth.

•  The Impact of Geopolitical Risk on Consumer Expectations and Spending  Yuriy Gorodnichenko, Dimitris Georgarakos, Geoff Kenny, and Olivier Coibion / NBER

  Abstract: Using novel scenario-based survey questions that randomize the expected duration of the Russian invasion of Ukraine and Middle East conflict, we examine the causal impact of geopolitical risk on consumers’ beliefs about aggregate economic conditions and their own financial outlook. Expecting a longer conflict leads European households to anticipate a worsening of the aggregate economy, with higher inflation, lower economic growth, and lower stock prices. They also perceive negative fiscal implications, anticipating higher government debt and higher taxes. Ultimately, households view the geopolitical conflict as making them worse off financially and it leads them to reduce their consumption.

Russia’s Struggling Economy

•   Can Russia Weather a Fuel Crisis Caused by Ukrainian Drone Attacks?   Carnegie Politika

  Once again, Russia is in the grips of a gasoline crisis. Prices at the pump are rising, and some gas stations have run dry. This isn’t the first time Russia has experienced such shortages, but this time around they could be more serious because of the ongoing war in Ukraine.  There were gasoline crises in Russia both before the full-scale invasion (in 2011,2018, and 2021), and afterward (in 2023). Despite a 2024 Ukrainian drone campaign targeting Russian refineries, the fuel market remained relatively calm. Back then, each refinery was only hit by a single drone, reducing plant capacity but leaving it operational. The damage was dealt with in a matter of weeks, consecutive attacks, were rare and often deflected, and neighboring plants continued to operate without interruption. Ultimately, the 2024 drone attacks caused inconvenience and expense for the Russian oil industry, but did not present a major problem.   This time could be quite different.

• Putin’s Fear of a Humiliating Economic Crisis     Foreign Policy

  Russian President Vladimir Putin has every reason to seek a lifeline for the Russian economy. In recent weeks, a flurry of signs has shown Russia’s war-drained, sanctions-constrained economy to be at an inflection point. For the first time since the start of the war, nonmilitary economic activity has been contracting, bankers are making plans to weather a financial crisis, and energy firms are worrying about losing their largest customer for seaborne oil exports.  Putin’s intensifying economic troubles have important implications for Western policymakers as they begin negotiating with Moscow about the future of Ukraine. Unlike the impression the Russian leader tries to make, time is far from being on his side. In fact, economic pressure remains the best leverage that Ukraine’s supporters have over the Kremlin. It remains to be seen whether Europe and the United States will choose to play the economic ace they still have up their sleeves.

The Global Race for Critical Minerals

• Why Is Renewing AGOA Strategic for U.S.-Africa Minerals Diplomacy?   Center for Strategic and International Studies

  The African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), first signed into law by President Bill Clinton in 2000, is a unilateral U.S. trade preference program set to expire in September 2025. Its pending reauthorization has sparked debate over whether—and how—it should be extended and reformed. A failure to extend AGOA could have larger ramifications at a time when the United States is doubling down on its commercial diplomacy—and more specifically, its mineral diplomacy efforts—with Africa.
  

• Europe’s Strategic Access to Battery Minerals in a Changing Geoeconomic Landscape   The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies

  Europe’s transition to a low-carbon economy hinges on the rapid deployment of battery technologies. Batteries are essential for stabilizing electricity grids powered by renewables and for enabling the shift from internal combustion engine (ICE) cars to electric vehicles (EV), especially after the European Union’s (EU) 2035 ban on new ICE cars. The successful deployment of batteries in Europe depends on secure supply chains, which are heavily concentrated. China plays a dominant role across the entire battery supply chain. It produces most of the world’s batteries and controls large shares of battery material mining and processing capacity, including graphite, lithium, manganese and phosphate. The Chinese government can use its control over battery supply chains to exert geopolitical pressure on other countries.  To reduce its vulnerability, Europe could choose to look into types of batteries that rely less on raw materials whose supply chain is dominated by China.

Recommended Weekend Reads

Mexico’s Oil Giant is at a Crossroads, Can Iran Rebuild its Nuclear Program, and Just How Desperate is their Leadership?, Why US House Prices Stayed Resilient Versus the Rest of the World,  and America’s Population Crash

August 8 - 11, 2025

Below are a number of reports and articles we read this past week and found particularly interesting.  Hopefully, you will find them of interest and useful as well.  Have a great weekend.

The Americas 

• Pemex Is at a Crossroads        Americas Quarterly

  Mexico’s government announced a deal to support the deteriorating finances of the state-owned oil company, Petróleos Mexicanos SA (Pemex). By issuing instruments called pre-capitalized notes, the Sheinbaum administration hopes to stabilize the financial performance of a company that has been reporting losses for at least the last 10 years. However, Pemex is besieged not only by mounting financial liabilities but also by a series of issues that compromise its future and, to some extent, its current operations.

• Assessing the Impact of China-Russia Coordination in the Media and Information Space   Ryan Berg/Center for Strategic and International Studies

  Since the announcement between Presidents Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping of a “no limits partnership” on the eve of Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, concerns have swirled over the potential for a new axis of revisionist authoritarian powers. Spearheaded by Moscow and Beijing, such an alliance could not only threaten the Eurasian landmass but reach across oceans to challenge the United States in the Western Hemisphere. However, the full implications and scope of the China-Russia partnership, particularly as it may pertain to Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). The CSIS Americas Program designed a novel tabletop exercise to better understand the consequences.  The findings found that when given the opportunity to coordinate, China and Russia eagerly did so and were able to secure a favorable outcome to the initial crisis. However, on the subsequent game turn, the United States, which had invested in building more long-term influence in the region, nevertheless secured its preferred policy outcome in both iterations of the game  This suggests that U.S. influence in LAC appears to remain sizeable, but closer China-Russia cooperation should be accorded more gravity than it currently receives in policy discussions.

Iran’s Future

• Damage to Iran’s Nuclear Program—Can It Rebuild?   The Center for Strategic and International Studies

  In the immediate aftermath of the U.S. strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities on June 22, “Operation Midnight Hammer,” policymakers and experts launched into a heated debate not only about the physical damage of the strikes but also about their impact on Iran’s long-term nuclear ambitions. Recent satellite imagery allows us to have a more realistic picture of the extent of the damage from the Israeli and U.S. strikes. It also provides insights into Iran’s initial efforts to rebuild its nuclear program and can help identify potential pathways for developing a covert nuclear weapons program, including establishing a third site to process its existing stockpile of 400 kilograms (kg) of highly enriched uranium (HEU). We determined that the U.S. and Israeli strikes inflicted significant damage on Iran’s nuclear program by destroying key infrastructure and human capital. Israel’s broader campaign against Iran also targeted military leaders, Iranian missiles, and defense industrial base targets. The precision of these operations revealed a deep penetration of intelligence, particularly by Mossad, into Iran’s nuclear program. The strikes did not, however, completely eliminate the nuclear program, with some infrastructure remaining intact, and the status of the HEU stockpile remains unknown. But whether or not Iran rebuilds its nuclear program is ultimately a political decision and will depend on three sets of factors: decision-making in Tehran, diplomacy with the United States, and Israel.

• Iran’s Dangerous Desperation: What Comes After the 12-Day War     Suzanne Maloney/Foreign Affairs

  As the writer James Baldwin once remarked, “The most dangerous creation of any society is the man who has nothing to lose.” That description might now apply to the men who preside over the ruins of Iran’s revolutionary system. With their proxy network degraded, their air defenses demolished, and their great-power alignments exposed as hollow, the debilitated guardians of the Islamic Republic require new tools to keep the wolves at bay. It is difficult to predict with confidence how factional dynamics will evolve in the aftermath of the regime’s humbling; further surprises may be in store. But there can be little doubt that the most powerful set of players in Tehran will seek to reconstitute the remnants of its nuclear program and reassert the regime’s dominance over Iranian society.

U.S. Economics and Demographic Changes

• Why U.S. House Prices Stayed Resilient While Prices Fell in Other Countries    Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

  Following decades of low and stable inflation, the period from 2021 to 2024 marked a dramatic global surge in inflation and an unprecedented cycle of monetary tightening. This recent monetary tightening cycle created a puzzle: Why did housing markets across developed countries respond so differently to the same global pressures?  For example, during the 2020-21 expansion, the U.S. and Canada experienced house price appreciation of more than 25% while Sweden recorded increases approximately half as large. (See the first figure.) But when central banks began aggressive tightening in 2022, a striking divergence emerged. The U.S. housing market showed remarkable resilience, with only moderate price adjustments despite Federal Reserve rate hikes that pushed mortgage rates from 2.8% to 6.8%. In stark contrast, Sweden and Canada experienced sharp corrections, with Swedish prices falling substantially below their 2019 baseline levels.

• Sprinters, Marathoners & Skeptics on the Future of AI & Power   War on the Rocks

  Will AI eat the world and America’s defense budget? I think of those who toil at the intersection of AI and national security as being divided into three camps: Sprinters hold the most aggressive assumptions and believe profound disruption via artificial general intelligence is imminent; marathoners believe the technology will diffuse selectively, sector-by-sector; and skeptics draw analogies to the dot-com bubble.  America’s near-term AI strategy should align with one of these three approaches. If the sprinter scenario holds, the United States should go all-out to rapidly acquire artificial general intelligence — defined here as human-level intelligence. If the skeptics are right, however, then the United States should do virtually the opposite and avoid overbuilding and overextension. If the marathoners are most correct, then the United States will conduct a complicated, long-term technological competition with a country four times its population.

• Consumer Inflation Expectations Across Surveys and over Time   Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland

  Different survey-based measures of consumer inflation expectations have diverged in recent months. This Economic Commentary compares these measures and the survey questions underlying them. Our analysis suggests that the divergences across survey-based measures of inflation expectations can be attributed to various features and sample characteristics specific to each survey.

• Changes in Milestones of Adulthood     U.S. Census Bureau

  ABSTRACT: This study uses nationally representative data from 2005 and 2023 to examine changes in young adults’ (ages 25-34 years old) experiences reaching five milestones of adulthood: living away from their parents, completing their education, labor force participation, marrying, and living with a child. Changes are considered for individual milestones, as well as for combinations of milestones. The types and combinations of milestones young adults experience have seen major shifts in the past several decades, with growth in the shares experiencing economic markers, and reductions in those who experience family formation events. between 2005 and 2023, the fraction of Americans aged 25–34 who completed their education rose from 74% to 83%, but the percentage of “ever married” fell from 62% to 44%, and the percentage with “a child in the household” fell from 55% to 39%.

• America’s Fertility Crash Reaches A New Low   The Economist

  In recent years, birth rates have dropped only slightly in places where they have long been low. Four of the five least fertile states in 2014, including Connecticut and Massachusetts, have seen their rates decrease by less than the national average. It is in states that have been historically the most fertile where the fall has been precipitous; Alaska, North Dakota and Utah have seen some of the steepest declines. All told, states that had above average fertility rates in 2014 are responsible for more than 80% of the collapse in American birth rates over the past decade.

• As US population growth slows, we need to reset expectations for economic data   Peterson Institute for International Economics

  US population growth has slowed sharply in the last year and a half, as the immigration surge of the early 2020s has ended and the population continues to age. Fewer jobs are needed to keep up with the growth of the labor force, and growth rates of output and consumption will fall even if per capita output and consumption hold steady. The total US population is growing at an annualized rate of 0.5 percent, down from 1 percent in late 2023. With slower population growth, any given level of monthly payroll growth, consumption growth, or output growth reflects a stronger economy than it did a year ago. Population growth is not only slowing; it has also become more volatile and harder to estimate. It is likely that current population estimates for 2025 that statistical agencies are incorporating into economic data are too high and will be revised downward; current population estimates imply much higher immigration in 2025 than is likely under current administration policy. Economic data will need to be reinterpreted and revised in line with future adjustments to population estimates.

Recommended Weekend Reads

Looking at the Effects of Mexico’s Judicial Reform on FDI and USMCA, The Strait of Malacca Emerges as China’s Achilles Heel, Looking at Africa’s Financial Flows, and the Growth of Export Controls as a Strategic Weapon

July 11 - 13, 2025

Below are the reports and studies we found of particular interest this past week.  We wanted to share them with you in the hope they will be useful to you.  Please let us know if you have any questions.  We hope you have a wonderful weekend.

America

• No Checks on Power?  The Effects of Mexico’s Judicial Reform on Foreign Investment and the USMCA   Center for Strategic and International Studies

  On September 11, 2024, Mexico’s senate approved a sweeping constitutional reform meant to fundamentally reshape the country’s judicial system, principally by having all judges in the country be popularly elected to their positions. Its architect, former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO), had spent his six-year term railing against the Mexican judiciary, asserting that the rot of corruption, nepotism, and abuse of power had spread to judges at all levels—federal, state, and local. The genesis of the reform is AMLO’s clashes with the judicial branch. Frustrated by the Supreme Court repeatedly striking down important aspects of his legislative agenda, AMLO came to believe that the Fourth Transformation, his ambitious project to end the “neoliberal era” in Mexico, would require far-reaching constitutional changes to be truly consolidated. During a recent CSIS Americas Program event on the immediate and long-term effects of the reform, panelists and legal experts noted that the constitutional amendment was a key piece in a larger political chessboard aimed at transforming Mexico into a more consolidated state under one-party rule, with potentially disastrous consequences for Mexico’s legal and economic future.

• Colombia Wages War on Cash With New Central Bank Payment Network   Bloomberg

  Colombia’s central bank needs to win over skeptics as it tries to modernize the financial system and reduce the nation’s heavy reliance on cash. While most Colombians now have access to financial products, adoption of digital payments lags emerging market peers such as Brazil due to high transaction costs and a lack of trust. The bank thinks it can fix these problems with the upcoming launch of Bre-B, its new payment infrastructure. Colombians are signing up for digital wallets and low-value deposit accounts at a rapid pace, but they’re still not using them much. As of 2024, about 70% of Colombian adults had at least one such account, and yet nearly 8 out of 10 transactions still take place in cash.

• What Passage of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” Means for US Energy and the Economy   The Rhodium Group

  The fiscal year 2025 budget reconciliation legislation, commonly called the “One Big Beautiful Bill” (OBBB) and signed into law by President Trump last week, will have meaningful reverberations across the US energy sector and economy. We estimate the law will increase national average household energy bills by $78-192 and increase total industrial energy expenditures by $7-11 billion in 2035. The OBBB will cut the build-out of new clean power generating capacity by 53-59% from 2025 through 2035. All told, the law puts more than half a trillion dollars of clean energy and transportation investment at risk of cancellation. It also puts new economic pressure on operating facilities that manufacture clean energy technology—tied to nearly $150 billion of investment—given greatly reduced domestic demand for these products. Though these figures represent substantial changes from the baseline, the impacts could be even more substantial depending on how executive actions shape the law’s implementation.

• ‘The president is pissed’: Trump's Brazil tariff threat is part of a bigger geopolitical dispute  Politico

• President Donald Trump is framing his threat to slap a bruising 50 percent tariff on Brazil as a quest for justice for his friend and ally, far-right former President Jair Bolsonaro. But it was his displeasure at a gathering of emerging market nations in Rio de Janeiro over the weekend that tipped the president over the edge, convincing him to send a letter laying out the new levies, according to four people familiar with the situation, granted anonymity to share details. The White House concluded that other methods of punishing Brazil for its perceived mistreatment of Bolsonaro and its alleged censorship on social media, like sanctions, would take too long or were too complex, according to two of the people.  But “BRICS tipped the scale,” said Mauricio Claver-Carone, a close ally of Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Trump’s former special envoy to Latin America.
  
  

  China

• The Malacca Dilemma: China’s Achilles’ Heel    Modern Diplomacy

  President Trump’s recent claims on the Panama Canal and the annexation of Greenland in the Arctic Circle have brought to the fore one of the most paramount notions of geopolitics: command of the sea. “Who rules the waves rules the world.”  For China, there is growing concern over a major maritime chokepoint of the Strait of Malacca. All of China’s energy sea lines of communication (SLOCs) converge through this strait. Each year, $3.5 trillion worth of trade—equivalent to one-third of global GDP—passes through the Strait of Malacca, including two-thirds of China’s total trade volume, over 83% of its oil imports, and approximately 16 mb/d of oil and 3.2 mb/d of LNG. Roughly 6.4 billion deadweight tons (dwt) of cargo pass through the strait annually, with about 10 vessels entering or exiting every hour. Most of these shipments consist of fossil fuels from the Middle East and Africa.

• Quest for Strategic Autonomy?  Europe Grapples with the US - China Rivalry    Mario Esteban, Miguel Otero-Iglesias, Cristina de Esperanza, eds., European Think Tank Network on China

  The intensifying rivalry between the US and China has reshaped Europe’s strategic calculations. Building on the 2020 European Think Tank Network on China (ETNC) report, which assessed Europe’s positioning in this context, this edition re-examines the geopolitical landscape in light of the Covid-19 pandemic, Russia’s war in Ukraine, and Donald Trump’s return to the White House. This report features 22 national chapters and one dedicated to the EU, analysing the evolution of Europe’s relations with Washington and Beijing, the range of approaches to dealing with the US-China rivalry, and how these are expected to evolve.

• China Wants 115,000 Nvidia Chips to Power Data Centers in the Desert   Bloomberg Technology

  A Bloomberg News analysis of investment approvals, tender documents and company filings shows that Chinese firms aim to install more than 115,000 Nvidia Corp. AI chips in some three dozen data centers across the country’s western deserts. Operators in Xinjiang intend to house the lion’s share of those processors in a single compound — which, if they can pull it off, could be used to train foundational large-language models like those of Chinese AI startup DeepSeek. The complex as envisioned would still be dwarfed by the scale of AI infrastructure in the US, but it would significantly boost China’s computing prowess as President Xi Jinping pushes for technological breakthroughs. Such a project also would raise serious concerns for officials in Washington, who restricted leading-edge Nvidia chip sales to China in 2022 over worries that advanced AI could give Beijing a military edge.
  
  

  Africa

• Financial Flows: Thematic Future    Institute for Security Studies (South Africa)/African Futures

  This theme on Africa’s financial flows explores the key inward monetary flows shaping Africa’s development, namely official development assistance (aid), foreign direct investment (FDI) and remittances, while also assessing the scale and impact of illicit financial flows. The analysis considers the size and impact of these flows at the regional and country levels. A Financial Flows scenario is modeled subsequently to assess the potential impact of ambitious increases in aid, FDI, remittances, and portfolio investments to Africa and a reduction in illicit financial flows.

Geoeconomics & Trade

• Modern Globalization and the Nation State – The Evolving International Political Economy   European Centre for International Political Economy

  Unresolved political economy contradictions are becoming more evident – between a national manufacturing narrative versus actual technology-led globalization, balancing open trade versus protection, old industries like steel against the new like AI, and whether governments or major corporates are primarily driving these developments. Leaders face the huge challenges to acknowledge today’s complex interdependent world, define essential national interests against special interest pleading, and work with others to deliver their objectives. Not doing so will only exacerbate uncertainty prevalent across countries.
  

• From National Security to Strategic Leverage   International Institute for Strategic Studies

  As export controls evolve from national security tools to instruments of strategic leverage, the US–China strategic competition is entering a new, more transactional phase. The recent tit-for-tat over chip-design software and rare earths reveals a shifting geopolitical battleground defined by chokepoints, coalition-building, and the race to reduce dependencies.

• Soft Landing or Stagnation? A Framework for Estimating the Probabilities of Macro Scenarios   Federal Reserve Board Economic Research

  Abstract: Amid ongoing trade policy shifts and geopolitical uncertainty, concerns about stagflation have reemerged as a key macroeconomic risk. This paper develops a probabilistic framework to estimate the likelihood of stagflation versus soft landing scenarios over a four-quarter horizon. Building on Bekaert, Engstrom, and Ermolov (2025), the model integrates survey forecasts, structural shock decomposition, and a non-Gaussian BEGE-GARCH approach to capture time-varying volatility and skewness. Results suggest that the probability of stagflation was elevated at around 30 percent in late 2022, while the chance of a soft landing was below 5 percent. As inflation moderated and growth remained strong through 2024, these probabilities reversed. However, by mid-2025, renewed tariff concerns drove stagflation risk back up and the probability of a soft landing lower. These shifts highlight the potential value of distributional forecasting for policymakers and market participants navigating uncertain macroeconomic conditions.

Recommended Weekend Reading

Europe’s Seismic Defense and Economic Shifts, Looking at China’s Lock on Latin America’s Ports, the Struggle to Meet the Skyrocketing Energy Demands of US Data Centers, and the Geopolitics of AI

June 27 - 29, 2025

This past week, we found these reports and studies particularly interesting and useful and wanted to share them with you. Hopefully, you will find them useful as well.  Please let us know if you have any questions or if you or a colleague wish to be added to our email list.

The Rapidly Changing Defense and Economic Future of Europe 

• Is Germany Without Its Debt Brake on the Right Track?    International Economy Magazine

  Long before Germany’s decision to initiate an aggressive military buildup in response to the Trump administration’s new isolationist policies, a powerful chorus in Germany was heavily campaigning to loosen or reform the country’s debt brake, the so-called Schuldenbremse enshrined in the German constitution. Many policymakers envisioned an aggressive infrastructure buildup paid for with public spending financed by much higher public debt. Such a constitutional change had long been thought undoable. What will be the end result of a huge European debt expansion led by a Germany that now admits its military spending and spending on high-tech–related public infrastructure have been inadequate? What kind of pressure will the European Central Bank face? To answer these and many other questions, International Economy Magazine asked a group of experts (including yours’s truly) to offer their views.

• Trump’s European revolution        European Council on Foreign Relations

  New ECFR polling suggests that Donald Trump is transforming political and geopolitical identities not only in the US, but also in Europe.  Trump’s second presidency is recasting the European far-right as the continental vanguard of a transnational revolutionary project, and mainstream parties as the new European sovereigntists.  It is also transforming geopolitical attitudes and accelerating the shift from a European peace project to a war project.  Many Europeans support increased military spending, conscription, independent nuclear deterrents, and defending Ukraine even if the US abandons it.  However, they also doubt that Europe can achieve strategic autonomy fast enough and are therefore inclined to hedge. Conscription is less popular among the young; support for Ukraine may reflect reluctance to confront Russia directly; many hope America will return after Trump.

China

• No Safe Harbor: Evaluating the Risk of China’s Port Projects in Latin America and the Caribbean     Center for Strategic and International Studies

  In this groundbreaking interactive report, CSIS reports on how China is rapidly expanding its influence over maritime ports across Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) – 37 in all.  By building, financing, and buying up key ports, Chinese firms have become deeply embedded in the physical infrastructure connecting the region’s dynamic maritime economy. While these investments bring commercial opportunity, they also open the door for Beijing to gain strategic leverage, collect sensitive data, and expand its geopolitical influence closer to U.S. shores. 

• How China Wins – Beijing’s Advantages in a Revisionist Order   Julian Gewirtz/Foreign Affairs

  In recent years, many analysts have hotly debated the scope and scale of the challenge that Beijing poses to the international order. This debate now finds itself in a peculiar moment, as Trump has made the United States appear as the more explicitly revisionist power, openly upending the international order it once championed. By withdrawing from UN bodies; placing tariffs on the entire world, including on U.S. allies; threatening to seize Canada and Greenland; and undermining collective principles of law and pluralism, the second Trump administration has given China unprecedented space to present itself as both a defender and a reformer of the existing order. That is allowing China to gain greater influence in existing institutions, exploit fear and uncertainty to pull long-standing U.S. partners closer to Beijing, and build its own alternative institutions and relationships even as it continues to flout international rules and norms. Trump and Xi are turning U.S.-Chinese competition into a story of two self-interested, domineering superpowers looking to squeeze countries around the world—and each other—for whatever they can get. This dramatic shift plays into China’s hands and undermines core U.S. strengths in the long-term competition over the future international order.

Challenges to the Global Energy Markets

• U.S. Power Struggle: How Data Centre Demand is Challenging the Electricity Market Model     Wood Mackenzie

  US utilities have been caught flat-footed as a surge in the development of power-hungry data centers and manufacturing facilities has packed load interconnection queues.  This has left the power sector with a demand growth dilemma. And the challenge has only intensified. There are substantial hurdles to meeting such gargantuan demand growth: procurement bottlenecks for critical supply-side equipment, the retirement of substantial amounts of coal-fired generation, tariff and energy policy changes that make renewables development more challenging, long lead times on new projects and the need for transmission upgrades.  In some cases, just a few major customers will soon account for as much utility infrastructure investment as all other customers put together, reshaping utilities’ risk profile. In a competitive power market, if data centers are added faster than new power plants can be brought online, it could threaten grid reliability and lead to power outages.  

• Assessing Emissions from LNG Supply and Abatement Options    International Energy Agency

  Around 550 billion cubic meters (bcm) of natural gas were exported as liquefied natural gas (LNG) in 2024, just under 15% of global natural gas consumption. A further 500 bcm of natural gas were transported through pipelines. Global LNG supply has grown faster than overall natural gas demand in recent years. This trend is set to continue with the arrival of nearly 300 bcm of new annual LNG supply capacity between 2025 and 2030.  The bottom line: LNG brings fewer Earth-warming emissions than coal, but that oft-debated comparison sets the bar way too low, the IEA argues. 

Geoeconomics

• How Do Central Banks Control Inflation?  A Guide for the Perplexed   Journal of Economic Literature

  Abstract: Central banks have a primary goal of price stability. They pursue it using tools that include the interest they pay on reserves, the size and the composition of their balance sheet, and the dividends they distribute to the fiscal authority. We describe the economic theories that justify the central bank’s ability to control inflation and discuss their relative effectiveness in light of the historical record. We present alternative approaches as consistent with each other, as opposed to conflicting ideological camps. While interest-rate setting may often be superior, having both a monetarist pillar and fiscal support is essential, and at times pegging the exchange rate or monetizing the debt is inevitable.

• The Sacrifice Trap of War       John Temming/Christopher Coyne – George Mason University/SSRN

  Abstract: This paper explores the political economy of the sacrifice trap of war--the conflict-related version of the sunk cost fallacy, where policymakers invest additional resources in failing wars because of prior sacrifices already made. Once the initial decision to engage in war is made, democratic leaders face strong incentives to signal success to citizens. These incentives stem from the need to maintain public support, preserve their reputation as effective leaders, and establish a positive legacy. However, policymakers do not bear war's full costs, instead shifting significant burdens onto others. This cost-shifting allows them to ignore sunk costs with minimal personal consequence, creating a negative political externality--the overproduction of war compared to situations where policymakers internalize the full costs of their actions. These dynamics, combined with policymakers' desire to maintain their identity as a strong and effective leader, explain how societies become mired in war's sacrifice trap. After exploring the sacrifice trap's theoretical foundations, we examine two historical cases--U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War (1955-1975) and in the Iraq War (2003-2011).

Artificial Intelligence, National Security & Geopolitics 

• On the Geopolitics of AGI        Geopolitics of AGI/Rand Corporation

  A decade ago, few believed that artificial general intelligence (AGI)—human-level or superhuman-level cognition across a wide variety of tasks—would emerge in our lifetime. Today, policymakers and executives worldwide are confronting the possibility that AI systems could soon match or exceed human performance in nearly all economically and militarily significant domains. Whether leading AI companies cross the unknown, potentially unknowable threshold to AGI today or tomorrow, we will live for the foreseeable future in a world where increasingly advanced AI underpins transformational changes to economies, militaries, and societies. Moreover, this prospect of technological change coincides with a period of profound shifts in geopolitics and global security, as the postwar consensus erodes and the international system is once again characterized by explicit great-power competition.

• Five Questions: Jim Mitre on Artificial General Intelligence and National Security   Rand Corporation

  A computer with human—or even superhuman—levels of intelligence remains, for now, a what-if. But AI labs around the world are racing to get there. U.S. leaders need to anticipate the day when that what-if becomes “What now?” A recent RAND paper lays out five hard national security problems that will become very real the moment an artificial general intelligence comes online. Researchers did not try to guess whether that might happen in a few years, in a few decades, or never. They made only one prediction: If we ever get to that point, the consequences will be so profound that the U.S. government needs to take steps now to be ready for them. RAND vice president and national security expert Jim Mitre wrote the paper with senior engineer Joel Predd.

Recommended Weekend Reads

June 20 - 22, 2025

Assessing Israel’s Attack and the Limits of Iran’s Missile Strategy, A Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Fed’s Role in the Fixed Income Market, and Analyzing the Pentagon Pizza Index

Below are the studies and reports we found of particular interest this past week.  We hope you find them of interest, too.  Please let us know if you have any questions or if you or a colleague wants to be added to our distribution list.

The Israel-Iran Crisis

• How Iran Lost – Tehran’s Hard-Liners Squandered Decades of Strategic Capital and Undermined Deterrence    Afshon Ostovar/Foreign Affairs

  Iran’s hard-liners overplayed their hand. After Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, the regime’s leaders opted for a campaign of maximum aggression. Rather than letting Hamas and Israel fight it out, they unleashed their proxies at Israeli targets. Israel, in turn, was compelled to expand its offensive beyond Gaza. It succeeded in severely degrading Hezbollah, the most powerful of Tehran’s proxy groups, and eviscerating Iranian positions in Syria, indirectly contributing to the collapse of the Assad regime. Iran responded to this aggression by unleashing the two largest ballistic missile attacks ever launched against Israel. But Israel, backed by the U.S. military and other partners, repelled those attacks and incurred little damage. It then struck back. With that, the foundation of Iran’s deterrence strategy crumbled. Its ruling regime became more vulnerable and exposed than at any point since the Iran-Iraq War of the 1980s. And Israel, which has dreamed of striking Iran for decades, had an opportunity it decided it could not pass up.

• Israel’s attack and the limits of Iran’s missile strategy   International Institute for Strategic Studies

  Israel’s attack on Iran has exposed critical weaknesses in Tehran’s broader military strategy. While Iran still has untapped shorter-range capabilities it could deploy in its immediate neighborhood, its depleted medium-range missile arsenal and weakened regional allies leave it with limited options for retaliation against Israel.

• Options for Targeting Iran’s Fordow Nuclear Facility    Center for Strategic and International Studies

  In order to achieve its stated objective of dismantling Iran’s nuclear program, Israel will need to take out a key Iranian facility, the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant. Fordow is buried deep under a mountain near Qom and is believed to be one of the key sites of Iran’s nuclear enrichment activities, about 54,000 square feet in size, with 3,000 centrifuges. Due to its hardening and depth, Israel lacks the ordnance to take out Fordow on its own in the short term; however, multiple strikes from the U.S. GBU-57, carried out by U.S. B-2 bombers, could destroy the facility. There are at least five options for destroying Fordow. All of them will have varying degrees of impact on Iran’s nuclear program, along with unique risks of escalation and international response. Below is an analysis of all five options; however, to avoid escalation while still achieving nonproliferation objectives, Israeli sabotage appears to be an underappreciated option.

Geoeconomics

• Black Swans and Financial Stability: A Framework for Building Resilience    Daniel Barth/Stacey Schreft – Federal Reserve Board of Governors Finance and Economics Discussion Series (FEDS)

  Abstract: This article refines the concept of black swans, typically described as highly unlikely and catastrophic events, by clearly distinguishing between knowable and unknowable events. By emphasizing that black swans are “unknown unknowns,” the article highlights that the realization of new black swans cannot be prevented and motivates a need for policies that build the financial system's resilience to unforeseeable crises. The article introduces a "resilience principle" that calls for policies that are adaptable, universal, and systemic. Examples are provided of policies with these features, none of which relies on the official sector being better positioned than the private sector to anticipate the unknown.

• Bank Financing of Global Supply Chain     Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Working Paper Series

  Abstract: Finding new international suppliers is costly, so most importers source inputs from a single country. We examine the role of banks in mitigating trade search costs during the 2018–19 US-China trade tensions. We match data on shipments to US ports with the US credit register to analyze trade and bank credit relationships at the bank-firm level. We show that importers of tariff-hit products from China were more likely to exit relationships with Chinese suppliers and find new suppliers in other Asian countries. To finance their geographic diversification, tariff-hit firms increased credit demand, drawing on bank credit lines and taking out loans at higher rates. Banks offering specialized trade finance services to Asian markets eased both financial and information frictions. Tariff-hit firms with specialized banks borrowed at lower rates and were 15 percentage points more likely and three months faster to establish new supplier relationships than firms with other banks. We estimate the cost of searching for suppliers at $1.9 million (or 5 percent of annual sales revenue) for the average US importer.

• A Hitchhikers Guide to Federal Reserve Participation in Fixed Income Markets    Journal of Economic Perspectives

  The Federal Reserve has historically relied on banks and primary dealers, [but] the landscape for fixed income ownership shifted after the 2007–2009 financial crisis, and again after the March 2020 crisis. As of the end of 2024, [non-bank financial institutions] are more than three times larger than the US banking system. Participation of investment funds—including mutual funds, money market funds, hedge funds, money managers, and investment advisors—in auctions of Treasury securities increased from 1.7% in January 2008 to 67.8% in October 2023, whereas the share attributable to dealers and brokers’ share decreased from 79% to 19.4% during the same period.

• Investment in an increasingly global landscape      Bank for International Settlements (BIS)

  Private business fixed investment has fallen or remained flat in advanced economies for decades, with a recent levelling-off also observed in several emerging market economies.  The recent increase in uncertainty due to trade tensions will dampen investment while also reducing the effectiveness of monetary policy. In the long run, the outlook for private business investment depends on the potential need to reconfigure supply chains disrupted by higher trade tariffs as well as governments’ efforts to boost public investment and implement structural reforms.

Africa

• Africa’s Complicated Democratic Landscape     Center for Strategic and International Studies

  In 2024, the global trend of voters rejecting incumbents was reflected in Africa, where opposition parties made significant gains in countries with relatively strong democratic institutions. These results stemmed from economic frustration, widespread dissatisfaction with poor governance, and changing demographics.  The most critical elections of 2025 will be in countries where incumbents have used constitutional changes and institutional control to stay in power. As elections unfold, how voters engage with the process will be key to shaping the political future of their countries and the continent as a whole. There are several African elections worth watching in late 2025 to help make this determination: Cameroon, Tanzania, Côte d’Ivoire, and Guinea. Uganda's election in January 2026 is also one to watch.

• 21st-Century Africa: Governance and Growth    The World Bank

  When compared with the average living standards of the rest of the world, GDP per capita in Sub-Saharan Africa has declined over the past three decades. During the period 1990–2022, three distinct periods can be identified in the evolution of Sub-Saharan Africa’s real GDP per capita: a declining trend during 1990–2000 (from 30% to 25% of the world average), stagnant GDP per capita relative to the world during 2000-14 (fluctuating around 25%), and a declining trend from 2014 to 2022 (from 25% to 22% of the world average). The region’s lack of convergence in living standards with the rest of the world largely results from its inability to sustain growth over time. If Sub-Saharan Africa had grown (in per capita terms) at the same pace as the global economy since 1990, its level of income per capita in 2022 would have been more than 40% higher than its actual level. If it had grown at the same pace as emerging East Asia, the region’s income per capita would have been nearly three times its 2022 level. Currently home to 14% of the world’s working-age population, by 2100, Africa is projected to have 39%, representing more than a third of the workforce of the entire world.

• Africa has a new space agency — here’s what it will do    Nature Magazine

  Africa’s first continent-wide space agency, the African Space Agency (AfSA), which was inaugurated in April, is looking to secure funding as its first projects get underway.  AfSA is an initiative of the 55-member African Union (AU) and is headquartered in Cairo. It was established to coordinate the work of Africa’s existing efforts in space — more than 20 African countries have space programs. Priorities will include improving satellite communication, which provides crucial connectivity for rural populations. It also aims to generate and access data from space to track the effects of climate change, provide disaster relief, and aid agriculture, water, and food security.   

China 

• Is China Really Growing at 5 percent?      Federal Reserve Board of Governors FEDS Notes

  Chinese authorities recently announced a growth target of "around 5 percent" for 2025, the same as their 2024 target. Five percent is about half the pace of growth that China sustained from the 1980s to the early 2010s, but it is nonetheless quite high for an economy flirting with deflation and mired in a years-long property bust. The ambitious growth target, given the circumstances, has led many observers of the Chinese economy to once again treat the official GDP data with skepticism. All told, assessing the accuracy of China's GDP growth remains a challenge, and no statistical model can provide a definitive alternative measure. But our analysis suggests that official figures have not recently been overstating GDP growth for three reasons. First, the excess smoothness of official GDP has significantly diminished since the pandemic. Second, our alternative indicator, which relies on a broad set of data series informative about the Chinese business cycle, including consumption and the property sector, closely tracks official GDP. Finally, the supply side of China's economy has performed remarkably well in the context of robust demand for Chinese goods and industrial policies promoting self-reliance.
  

• China’s Car Industry Runs on Empty as Supply Chain Bills Go Unpaid    Financial Times

  In an effort to shore up automotive supply chains, the Chinese government mandated a 60-day supplier payment rule. Most carmakers suffer from negative working capital; only a handful of Chinese EV makers have sufficient net cash to comply with the new rule.

Assessing Geopolitical Risk

• Pentagon Pizza Index: The theory that surging pizza orders signal a global crisis Fast Company

  A different kind of pie chart is being used to predict global crises.  A surge in takeout deliveries to the Pentagon—now dubbed the “Pentagon Pizza Index”—has emerged as an unexpectedly accurate predictor of major geopolitical events. Tracking activity at local pizza joints in Arlington County, the X account Pentagon Pizza Report noted an uptick in Google Maps activity from four pizza places near the Pentagon on June 12. We, The Pizza, District Pizza Palace, Domino’s, and Extreme Pizza all reportedly saw higher-than-usual order volumes around 7 p.m. ET. “As of 6:59 p.m. ET nearly all pizza establishments nearby the Pentagon have experienced a HUGE surge in activity,” the X account posted. The timing? Just hours before news broke of Israel’s major attack on Iran. 

•  Geopolitical Shift: Corporate America’s Growing Focus on Global Risk    U.S. Chamber of Commerce

  Geopolitical risks are no longer a distant concern for businesses—they are a top-tier strategic and financial challenge. From supply chain disruptions to shifting regulations and market volatility, global instability now shapes investment decisions, corporate strategy, and economic security.  As a result, companies across all sectors are reporting more geopolitical concerns in their investor communications since 2009. This trend has accelerated sharply since 2019.  And technology companies show the highest levels of concern, though the increase spans all industries.

Recommended Weekend Reads

China’s Space Station “Guard Dogs,”  How China Gets Around US Tariffs, Why Canada May Be the Best Hope for Mineral Security, and How Smuggled US Fuel Funds Mexican Cartels

June 13 - 15, 2025

Below are some of the more intriguing analyses and insights we read this past week. We hope you find them useful.  Please let us know if you or someone you know wants to be added to our distribution list. 

China

• China is arming its space station with ‘guard dogs.’ They have good reason for it   Fast Company

  China is developing robotic guards for its Tiangong space station. Equipped with small thrusters, these AI-powered robotic beasts are being developed to intercept and physically shove suspicious objects away from their orbital outpost. It’s a deceptively simple but ingenious step towards active space defense in an increasingly militarized domain. Rather than firing directed energy weapons like lasers or projectiles, which will turn the potential invader into a cloud of deadly shrapnel flying at 21 times the speed of sound, the Chinese have thought of a very Zen “reed that bends in the wind” kind of approach. The bots will grapple a threatening object and lightly push it out of harm’s way. Elegant space jiu-jitsu rather than brute kickboxing.
  

• Axis, Rivalry, or Chaos?  The US-China-Russia Equation with Michael McFaul    China Considered Podcast

  China expert Dr. Elizabeth Economy and Michael McFaul, the former US Ambassador to Russia and currently a Stanford Univeristy professor,  sit down to discuss the relationship between the United States, China, and Russia, the history of US engagement with Russia, his experience as the United States Ambassador to Russia under President Barack Obama, and the increasing cooperation between China and Russia. McFaul begins by discussing early engagement with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev during the early Obama years, namely the signing of comprehensive multilateral sanctions with Iran, along with his role in crafting the Obama administration’s Russia policy. The two scholars then shift to a conversation about how Russia and China, namely Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, are attempting to reshape the international order, how the war in Ukraine has already changed this relationship, and whether a “reverse Kissinger” is possible from the perspective of the United States.
  

• Will China Force a Rethink of Biological Warfare?    War on the Rocks

  Is the Defense Department still preparing to fight biological warfare as if it’s 1970? When preparing for biological warfare, most nations picture scenarios in which an enemy openly sprays traditional agents over wide areas to kill their adversaries.  However, revolutionary capabilities in the life sciences and biotechnology have transformed the threat. China’s approach to warfare, combined with these emerging technologies, reveals new vulnerabilities among Western forces that, to date, have not been fully acknowledged.   Although Western attention has focused on the rapid expansion of China’s nuclear and conventional warfighting capabilities, one ought to expect equal analysis of China’s biological warfare potential. By examining China’s most recent efforts at biological research, this report puts forward that it has bypassed 20th-century Western concepts of biological warfare and has new capabilities that could be effective across the entire conflict spectrum. New approaches and new concepts will be necessary if the United States is to prepare itself for potentially new forms of biological warfare in the 21st century.
  

• How China Gets Around US Tariffs     Robin Brooks Substack

  Brooks, a Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington and former Chief Economist at the Institute of International Finance, as well as former Chief FX Strategist at Goldman Sachs, details how China has circumvented US tariffs by transshipping goods to the US through various third countries. The charts below show China’s exports (black) and imports (blue) to and from various countries in Asia: Indonesia (top left), Malaysia (top right), Thailand (bottom left), and Vietnam (bottom right). In all cases, China’s exports in April 2025 - the month in which US tariffs on China briefly went to 150 percent - reached new all-time highs, while imports remained subdued. Much as in the case of Kyrgyzstan or Kazakhstan, it’s not like domestic demand in these places started to boom with the escalation of the US-China trade war. The opposite is the case. This is - in all likelihood - evidence of big transshipments that are seeking to circumvent US tariffs.

 The Americas

• ·Canada May Be the United States’ Best Hope for Minerals Security   Center for Strategic and International Studies

  China’s recent export controls, especially of rare earth elements (REEs), have left Western companies reeling, with some firms allegedly considering shifting elements of production back to China just for access to the minerals. Indeed, the need for these minerals is so urgent that they took center stage in the recent U.S.-China negotiations in London, held in an effort to ease the trade war between the two countries. While the preliminary agreement to come out of these talks offers some respite, the United States needs to find reliable sources of REEs, and Canada could emerge as an alternative supplier to complement U.S. efforts to get domestic REE production back on its feet. However, this will require both countries to admit they still need each other, amidst the tension generated by President Donald Trump’ tariffs and talk of annexing Canada.

• The Hole in Mexico’s Security Strategy    Will Freeman/Foreign Affairs

  The defining dilemma of Claudia Sheinbaum’s presidency may be whether she is willing to alter the status quo with the cartels, raise the costs of collusion, and protect those who stand up to the cartels, instead. Since taking office in October 2024, Sheinbaum has taken a harder line on organized crime, increasing seizures of drugs and guns and arrests of suspected cartel operators. In February, when the Trump administration threatened tariffs on Mexico if it didn’t stop the flow of fentanyl across the border, Sheinbaum doubled down on her efforts, and the number of seizures and arrests has since grown substantially. But with their political and judicial protection networks still intact, any criminal groups that are weakened by the president’s current strategy may simply be replaced by new ones. Criminal-political networks will continue dividing the country into private fiefdoms, with politics, justice, and the legal economy reduced to arenas of lawless competition. Deadly drugs and insecurity will continue flowing north.

• How smuggled US fuel funds Mexico’s cartels    Financial Times

  In this interactive report by the Financial Times, reporters and researchers have uncovered dozens of suspicious shipments to Mexico, with millions of barrels of fuel falsely declared as industrial lubricant and unloaded by hose to trucks.  It reflects the massive and sophisticated smuggling operations funding Mexico’s cartels. As many as one in four vehicles in the country could be running on contraband fuel.

• Mexico’s Historic 2025 Judicial Elections: Winners, Controversies, and Political Implications    Moments in Mexico Substack

  On June 1, Mexicans went to the polls to vote in the country’s first-ever judicial elections.  881 federal positions were up for election and nearly 3,400 candidates ran.  Turnout was a record low – just 13% - but for President Claudia Sheinbaum’s ruling left-wing Morena Party, it secured significant control over the Supreme Court, further consolidating its political power. This excellent SubStack breaks down the elections and likely implications.

• Once the World’s ‘Most Popular Politician,’ Lula Is Losing His Way in Brazil    Bloomberg

  Six months after emergency brain surgery and in his second stint as president, the 79-year-old Brazilian remains as energetic and ambitious as ever on the world stage. He met Emmanuel Macron in Paris last week, will host the BRICS summit of emerging market countries in July, and is putting on the United Nations’ annual climate conference in the Amazon rainforest later this year.   But if that bravado once helped make him a global superstar — “the most popular politician on Earth,” Barack Obama called him in 2009 — it is now masking an ugly truth: Back home in Brazil, Lula is falling apart.  Polls show his popularity is at the lowest level of his presidency and suggest he will lose to a right-wing challenger.

The Growing Marketplace for Critical Minerals

• Building a New Market to Counter Chinese Mineral Market Manipulation   Center for Strategic and International Studies

  With China recently imposing export restrictions on rare earth elements—leading to U.S. automakers to halt production due to supply shortages—one of the most urgent issues is how to establish reliable Western supplies of essential critical minerals. A major challenge to achieving mineral security is China’s manipulation of global markets, whereby Chinese companies flood the market with excess supply, driving prices down to levels that force mining operations in countries like the United States and Australia to shut down. The United States and its allies cannot afford to act in isolation. Unilateral efforts—whether through tariffs, subsidies, or investment restrictions—will remain insufficient given the relatively small market share of individual countries. Instead, building a unified anchor market that aligns the policies of like-minded nations is the only realistic path to confronting China’s dominance. By harmonizing tariffs, establishing collective quotas, and coordinating investment protections, the anchor market can shift leverage away from Beijing and toward a more resilient, rules-based minerals ecosystem.

• Much More Than Minerals: The US-Ukraine Minerals Agreement and its Geopolitical Implications    CEPS

  After months of tense negotiations, the US and Ukraine signed a minerals agreement in Washington D.C. on 30 April 2025. While centered on natural resources, it’s much more than a business deal on mining natural resources. The Agreement enshrines US support for peace, resilience, sovereignty and reconstruction in Ukraine.  This CEPS Explainer breaks down the Agreement’s core provisions, its implications for all the parties involved and the necessary conditions needed for it to succeed.

• From Extraction to Innovation: The EU and Taiwan in the Critical Minerals Value Chain   ChinaObservers

  As the European Union’s green transition gains momentum, ensuring the safe and sustainable supply of critical raw materials (CRMs) has become a strategic priority. Renewable energy and decarbonization technologies – such as electric vehicles, wind turbines, solar panels, and batteries – depend on critical minerals including lithium, cobalt, nickel, and different rare earth elements (REEs). The EU’s agenda, as outlined in the European Green Deal and the accompanying industrial policy, cannot be achieved without robust, dependable, and diversified mineral value chains.